Philip K. Dick : The Author
It is here that Philip Dick clouds what it is to
act human according to the proponents of the
Turning Test. In Do Androids Dream of Electric
Sheep?, Philip has Deckard test for androids by
using an empathy box which "measures capillary
dilation in the facial area ... a primary
autonomic response, the so-called "shame" or
"blushing" reaction to a morally shocking
stimulus" (page 40). The human presumably
reacts without conscious or intellectual
reflection. The android has to consider if it
should be embarrassed or not and, in the time
that it takes to decide, the machine detects the
indecision. In Do Androids Dream of Electric
Sheep?, Philip K. Dick has characters that are
"chickenheads" who possess low I.Q's. These
citizens are often able to be more
empathetically human than the androids or the
other 'real' humans. The operational word here
is empathy. This is one aspect of humanity that
Philip K. Dick was working towards in his
stories "Human is", We Can Build You, and Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. The ability
to be empathetic is one important element that
separates the humans from the non-humans.
Philip Dick's account of what it is to be
human is very close to Kant's vision of the
autonomy of the will as found in Foundations of
the Metaphysics of Morals (1969). Kant writes,
"The will is concerned as a power of determining
ourself to action in accordance with the idea of
certain laws. And as such a power can be found
only in rational beings ... Now I say that man,
and in general any rational being, exists as an
end in himself, not merely as a means" (page
95). The problem is that computers are, on the
whole, more rational than humans. They are
rigid logic machines which have as their
foundations the performing of algorithms,
logic, and mathematical computations. As such,
they can be said to be more rational than most,
if not all, human beings. However, earlier in
The Groundwork... Kant states, "It is impossible
to conceive anything at all in the world ...
which can be taken as good without
qualification, except a goodwill. Intelligence,
wit, judgement, and any other talents of the
mind we may care to name ... can be extremely
bad and harmful when the will is not good" (page
[PAGE 12]